How to Reset a Hard Drive on PC or Mac. This wikiHow teaches you how to restore your Windows or macOS computer's hard drive to its original factory settings. Click the menu. Austin Mann Photographer found that the speed difference over his 2013 machine was dramatic, as you’d expect, but even over the maxed-out 2016 model it was seriously impressive. The test was simple: convert a 4K Mavic Pro video file to 1080p H.265 (HEVC) using QuickTime Player (File > Export As > 1080p > Check “Use HEVC”). I have three different MacBook Pros, all on macOS 10.13.6, all running QuickTime 10.4, all with the original file on the internal drive and exporting to the internal drive. Here are the results: My daily MBP until I discovered these results: 2.3 GHz i7 MacBook Pro (15″, Late 2013, 16 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD) = 1980 seconds (33 minutes) Top-of-line 2016 MBP: 2.9 GHz i7 MacBook Pro (15″, 16 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD) = 99 seconds This top-of-line 2018 MBP: 2.9 GHz i9 MacBook Pro (15″, 32 GB RAM, 4 TB SSD) = 24 seconds For a professional photographer, he says, even the of the 4TB SSD is money well spent. Laptopmag praised the ‘blazing’ performance, but wasn’t impressed by graphics element, nor the battery-life. This thing is screaming fast. We’re talking the fastest SSD ever in a laptop, plus some other benchmark scores that put some — though not all — Windows machines to shame [] It took the system just 2 seconds to duplicate 4.97GB worth of files, which translates to 2,519 megabytes per second. Incredulous, we found another synthetic benchmark to test the SSD called BlackMagic Disk Speed Test. An average write speed of 2,682 MBps [] The one area where this MacBook Pro falls a bit flat is graphics. On the OpenGL portion of the Cinebench R15 benchmark, which measures graphics performance, the 2018 MacBook Pro 13-inch yielded 41.1 frames per second. The XPS 13 scored 49.3 fps on the same test [] The MacBook Pro 13-inch did not fare well on our web surfing battery test. Maybe it’s the Core i7 CPU in our configuration or the dedicated T2 chip that’s always listening for Hey Siri or the Touch Bar (or all of the above), but we saw an unimpressive runtime of just 7 hours and 32 minutes. That’s well below the premium laptop average of 8:28. Mark Spoonauer also felt Apple’s design was somewhat lagging behind some Windows laptops, like Dell’s XPS 13. NASA engineer Craig Hunter said that the best review it has seen is one by, NASA aerospace engineer and developer of the iOS app Theodolite. He put it through a series of computational fluid dynamics simulations to benchmark performance, and was impressed. For a final CPU benchmark I want to look at, which solves a dense system of linear equations by LU decomposition with partial pivoting. Excel for mac + add a form free. You can drag this file to a permanent location in which it can be used. On the Tools menu choose Excel Add-ins. Click the Browse button and choose the saved file dataform3.xlam. I recommend making a folder called Add-ins in your Documents folder and drag dataform3.xlam into that folder. Now, open Excel 2016. ![]() This benchmark uses Intel’s Math Kernel Library (MKL) and solves a system of 15,000 equations. Here, the 2018 MacBook Pro runs with the two iMac Pro models up to about 5 cores before falling off, which is pretty impressive. Topping out with 260 GFLOPS at 6 cores, the new MacBook Pro is a whopping 60% faster than the old 2016 model was on 4 cores. He said that the 32GB RAM was very welcome, and the True Tone display is a ‘standout feature.’ The improvements collectively ’emphasize the “Pro” in MacBook Pro.’ MacWorld thinks it’s all about the speed, with the maximum RAM another pro benefit. I often say in laptop reviews that if you bought last year’s model, you probably won’t find the speed results compelling enough to upgrade. But this year is different for anyone who uses multi-core apps. Six processing cores is, well, better than four, and the performance boost is deeply satisfying for pro app users. You’ll find that the investment quickly pays for itself [] In another welcomed upgrade, Apple made the switch from DDR3 RAM in previous MacBook Pros to DDR4 RAM in the 2018 models [] The maximum amount you can have installed is now 32GB, double that of the previous 15-inch MacBook Pro. This is one change that users have been wanting for a while. But if your usage won’t benefit from the speed boost or extra RAM, says Roman Loyola, then there’s probably little reason to upgrade from either 2016 or 2017 models. TechCrunch agrees. As for performance, Apple’s not messing around here. Running Geekbench 4 (a popular PC benchmark), I got an impressive 5540 on the single core and 23345 with the multi-core test. Geekbench got similar — if slightly lower — results in its own tests on the high end. Here’s on the findings: For the 15-inch models, single-core performance is up 12-15%, and multi-core performance is up 39-46%. Since the underlying processor architecture hasn’t significantly changed between the 2017 and 2018 models, the increases in performance are due to higher Turbo Boost frequencies, more cores, and DDR4 memory.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2019
Categories |